Verified Results: Three Live Accounts, Published in Full
TL;DR Three live accounts, each with its full trade history on a public page. 11324902 — +5,920 USD, 74.3% win rate, 1.81 profit factor, 24.73% max drawdown. 11324901 — +573 USD, 73.1%, 2.07 PF, 7.5% max drawdown. 11429969 — +42 USD, 65.2%, 1.81 PF, 20.01% max drawdown. Read the drawdown column before the profit column: it is the number that tells you what holding these positions actually felt like. Past results do not predict future ones.
The accounts
Each badge links to that account's page, where the trade history sits in full — entries, exits, and the drawdown between them. Nothing is summarised on our side.
The numbers, side by side
| Account | Net | Win rate | Profit factor | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11324902 | +5,920 USD | 74.3% | 1.81 | 24.73% |
| 11324901 | +573 USD | 73.1% | 2.07 | 7.5% |
| 11429969 | +42 USD | 65.2% | 1.81 | 20.01% |
Three accounts, deliberately different in size. The point of showing all three rather than the best one is that the spread between them is the honest part.
Read the drawdown column first
The profit line is the one that gets quoted and the least useful of the four. Maximum drawdown is what tells you whether a record is something a person could have actually held.
Account 11324902 returned the most and also went through a 24.73% equity fall along the way. In practical terms that means at some point roughly a quarter of the balance was underwater while the strategy waited. Account 11324901 made far less in absolute terms but never fell more than 7.5% — a completely different experience of the same year.
Which of those is the better record depends entirely on what you would have done during the drawdown. Most people overestimate this about themselves, which is the reasoning laid out in drawdown, the number that matters more than profit.
Why the $42 account is here
Account 11429969 made forty-two dollars. It would be trivial to leave it out, and leaving it out is exactly the kind of selection that makes published records worthless.
A small account run for a short period produces a small, noisy result. That is not a failure of the strategy; it is what a small sample looks like, and showing it alongside the larger ones is the only way the set means anything. A page containing nothing but winners tells you the owner curated it, not that the strategy works.
What a record like this can and cannot tell you
- It can show that the trades were real, placed at real times, with the losses included.
- It can show the shape of the equity curve — steady, or one lucky stretch carrying everything.
- It cannot tell you next year's result. Market conditions change and no record predicts that.
- It cannot tell you your result, because position sizing, broker spread and whether you leave the system alone during a drawdown all change the outcome.
The verification checklist we apply to anyone else's record — and would encourage you to apply to ours — is in how to read a track record before trusting it.
How to check these yourself
- Open any badge above; it goes to that account's public page.
- Look at maximum drawdown before anything else.
- Check the number of trades — a handful is luck, not evidence.
- Look at the equity curve shape rather than the end point.
- Compare the period covered against what you would consider a fair test.
How these figures are produced: the numbers are read directly from each trading account rather than typed in by hand, and every trade sits on the linked account page — entries, exits, and the drawdown in between. Read them for what they are: a record of what happened on those accounts, not a forecast.
Questions we get
How are these results verified?
The data is read straight from the accounts, and every trade is public on the linked CopyConnectFX page.
Why is one account only up $42?
It is a small account over a short period. We publish it because omitting weak results is what makes records meaningless.
What does maximum drawdown mean on these records?
The largest peak-to-trough fall in equity — the worst stretch you would have had to hold through.
Will I get the same results?
No. Sizing, broker execution, balance and whether you intervene during drawdowns all change the outcome.
How often do these figures update?
The badges regenerate on every page load, so the numbers are current when you view them.
Why show three accounts instead of one?
Because the spread between them — 7.5% versus 24.73% drawdown — is what a single cherry-picked record hides.
The verdict
Three accounts, three quite different stories, all published including the one that barely moved. Read the drawdown before the profit, check the trade count before either, and treat the whole set as evidence about what happened rather than a forecast of what will. That is the most any record can honestly offer.
Want to see a specific account in detail?
Message us and we will walk you through the trade history on any of the three, including the losing stretches.
💬 Talk to Us on TelegramMore from the lab
Risk & affiliate disclosure: Educational content only, not financial advice. Trading gold (XAUUSD), forex and CFDs carries substantial risk of loss; a large majority of retail CFD accounts lose money. No results are guaranteed. We may earn a commission if you open an account through partner links, at no extra cost to you — this funds the free EA. See our Affiliate Disclosure.